USPTO serial 76024806
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
111 27 Stockholm, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felicia G. Traub
FELICIA G TRAUB COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations and for the treatment of muscular, skeletal and stress related disorders and diseases, alcohol abuse, overweight, and smoking; and vitamins | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | insurance services, namely, underwriting guarantor services in the field of medicine and health | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | broadcasting programs via the global computer network, namely, computer aided transmission of video messages and pictures; providing telecommunication connections to a global computer network; television; cable television and radio broadcasting | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | health clubs | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | physical therapy, namely, providing phsotherapeutic services; health care and medical services; medical clinics; nursing homes and hospitals; medical counseling, dentistry; and nursing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |