USPTO serial 76032812
PAPER SLOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAPER SLOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP J ANDERSON
ROBERT RYAN MORISHITA Morishita Law Firm4955 S. Durango Drive, Suite 153Las Vegas, NV 89148UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card game of chance using playing cards with depiction of slot machine indicia | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |