Drawing for THE DEEPWATER COMPANY

USPTO serial 76036047

THE DEEPWATER COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE DEEPWATER COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon Arnold

GORDON ARNOLD ARNOLD & ASSOCIATES2603 AUGUSTA STE 800HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Off-shore vessels and structures, namely jackets, compliant towers, spar platforms, floating production storage, offloading systems, semi-submersible vessels and platforms, tension leg platforms, topsides/decks, modules and skids, and rig conversions; drilling machines, namely, drilling rigs, drilling production platforms, drilling vessels, drill stations, oil exploration jackets, derricks, substructure and related equipment; mooring systems and anchor handling systemsACTIVE—
035System analysis, site analysis, cost analysis, life cycle cost analysis, pricing and contracting work for off-shore vessels and structures; procurement of off-shore vessels and structures; management, management supervision and consultation, and management assistance in the field of off-shore vessels and structuresACTIVE—
037Construction services, namely, construction and installation of off-shore vessels and structures; construction management and supervision; leasing of construction equipment for offshore vessels and structures; marine construction operationsACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of off-shore vessels and structures, namely jackets, compliant towers, spar platforms, floating production storage, offloading systems, semi-submersible vessels and platforms, tension leg platforms, topsides/decks, modules and skids, rig conversions, drilling machines, namely, drilling rigs, drilling production platforms, drilling vessels, drill stations, oil exploration jackets, derricks, substructure and related equipment, spar platforms, mooring systems and anchor handling systemsACTIVE—
042Engineering services, namely engineering design of off-shore vessels and structures; research and development of off-shore vessels and structures in the nature of conceptual development and selection and field development screeningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance