USPTO serial 76042964
POSITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SE-164 74 KISTA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
HOFFMANN & DINEFF, LTD820 W JACKSON BLVD STE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Putting together, input and systematization of information in data bases; product demonstrations; listing of product assortment; commercial information services; customer information in connection with selling of chattels; brokerage concerning chattels; on-line information regarding shopping; arranging of fairs and exhibitions for commercial purposes via global networks; marketing services and advertising services; providing consumer information on-line | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance services; financial affairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Tele communication services and data communication services including computer-aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of data from data bases to user apparatus to provide electronic shopping and interactive services, including games and chat; electronic mail, news services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2002 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |