USPTO serial 76052138
GLOBALCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3400416Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLOBALCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Capua
Robert M. Capua Connelly Roberts & McGivney LLCSuite 170055 West MonroeChicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, local exchange services, long distance services, international calling services, conference calling services, electronic transmission of messages and data, providing telecommunication connections to a global computer network and hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 14, 1993 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |