USPTO serial 76052139
GLOBALCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBALCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Capua
Robert M. Capua Roberts McGivney and Zagotta55 West Monroe Ste 1700Chicago, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, local exchange services, long distance services, international calling services, conference calling services, electronic transmission of messages and data, providing telecommunication connections to a global computer network and hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |