Drawing for POWERPIPE

USPTO serial 76052457

POWERPIPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERPIPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter D. Murray

PETER D MURRAY COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009BLANK MAGNETIC DATA CARRIERS; BLANK FLOPPY RECORDING DISCS; CASH REGISTERS; CALCULATING MACHINES; DATA PROCESSORS AND COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE GRAPHICS OF UTILITY PROGRAMS AND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS USED IN LIBRARY PRESENTATIONS; VIDEO GAMES ADAPTED FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERAL DEVICES; DATA AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS; COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS; BLANK COMPUTER SOFTWARE RECORDED ON DISCS, TAPES AND CASSETTES ALL FOR THE RECORDAL OF DATA AND/OR IMAGES; MUSICAL SOUND AND/OR VIDEO RECORDINGS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; HOME VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISION RECEIVERS; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES, DISCS AND CASSETTES; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES, DISCS AND CASSETTES; DATA PROCESSORS FOR USE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF AMUSEMENT ARCADES; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, DISCS; COMPUTER HARDWARE MEMORY CARDS FOR COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT; CD-ROM PLAYERS; TELEVISION RECEIVERS; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; AND PARTS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 21, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance