USPTO serial 76060571
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan P. Willson
SUSAN P WILLSON SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5141UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY MEANS OF A POINT ACCUMULATION PROGRAM WITH POINTS USED FOR DISCOUNTS ON FUTURE PURCHASES OF THOSE GOODS AND SERVICES; AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FEATURING A FREQUENT FLYER BONUS PROGRAM; ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF THE AIRLINE INDUSTRY, THE CAR RENTAL INDUSTRY AND CREDIT CARD INDUSTRY BY AWARDING POINTS TO PURCHASERS REDEEMABLE FOR GOODS AND SERVICES; PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY AWARDING PURCHASE POINTS FOR CREDIT CARD USE; PROMOTING THE SALE OF CREDIT CARD ACCOUNTS THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATION OF INCENTIVE AWARD PROGRAMS; PROMOTING THE SALE OF GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED MATERIAL. AND PROMOTIONAL CONTESTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |