USPTO serial 76063990
E2 EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E2 EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT A OUELLETTE
SCOTT A OUELLETTE MCERMOTT WILL EMERY28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES FOR PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE RETRIEVAL, ANALYSIS, AND ORGANIZATION OF DATA GENERATED BY PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES, AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES TO ENABLE PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES TO ADVERTISE AND MARKET THEIR GOODS AND SERVICES | ACTIVE | May 9, 2000 |
| 038 | COMPUTERIZED ELECTRONIC MAIL MANAGEMENT FOR PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE RETRIEVAL, ANALYSIS, AND ORGANIZATION OF DATA FROM ELECTRONIC MAIL GENERATED BY PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES TO ENABLE PROVIDERS OF GOODS AND SERVICES TO ADVERTISE AND MARKET THEIR GOODS AND SERVICES, AND PROVIDING ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | May 9, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |