USPTO serial 76066649
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith M. Stolte
KEITH M STOLTE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STSTE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting conferences, seminars, workshops, and events relating to the issues facing senior adults and the health, care and welfare of senior adults; providing information in the field of senior adult social activities; providing retirement center services, namely, providing health and fitness programs for senior adults | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Senior adult residence services, namely providing senior adult living facilities, retirement home and nursing home services; providing extended care facilities and services for senior adults; providing senior adult independent and semi-independent living facilities; providing senior adult social club services, cafe and restaurant services; providing information in the field of senior adult living; providing retirement center facilities | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |