USPTO serial 76085352
CREDIT-CHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3058290Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREDIT-CHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
C-CHIP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
C-CHIP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in controlling access to and use of consumer and industrial products by enabling and disabling their operation from a remote location | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by C-CHIP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by C-CHIP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by 3741672 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CREDIT-CHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 24, 2003 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |