USPTO serial 76090141
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald E. Helget
GERALD E HELGET BRIGGS & MORGAN, PA2400 IDS CTR 80 S EIGHTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING TWO-WAY WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SERVICES AMONG ALARM, SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS VIA ALARM SYSTEM MONITORING STATIONS AND REMOTE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY PAGERS, CELL PHONES, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, PERSONAL AND HANDHELD COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |