USPTO serial 76096952
REALSYNC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REALSYNC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shu Lin Town, Taipei Hsien, TW
Shu Lin Town, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Levin
AMANDA V DWIGHT DWIGHT LAW GROUP234 E 17TH ST STE 105-ACOSTA MESA, CA 92627UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Distributorships in the field of computer software and hardware, namely, computer software for optimizing the display quality and performance of computer monitors and for security monitoring and video conferencing system applications, computer hardware, namely computer monitors, computer operating systems, computer related products and components, and computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of computer software and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Realsync Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Realsync Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named REALSYNC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |