USPTO serial 76100641
ENTREPIDS THE E TRANSFORMATION COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORA, ROGER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTREPIDS THE E TRANSFORMATION COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL
BARBARA H LOEWENTHAL GOTTLEIB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES; MANAGEMENT OF E-COMMERCE COMPANIES ENGAGED IN BUSINESS TO BUSINESS AND BUSINESS TO CONSUMER SERVICES; ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA THE INTERNET AND THE RENTAL OF ADVERTISING SPACE ON THE INTERNET; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES; OUTSOURCING OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATED WITH THE INTERNET; MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES, NAMELY, GATHERING DATA REGARDING E-BUSINESS PROJECTS; CONDUCTING MARKETING STUDIES; PREPARING BUSINESS REPORTS; MARKET RESEARCH; ECONOMIC FORECASTING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, MAINTAINING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND IMPLEMENTATION; LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELD OF E-BUSINESS PROJECTS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES; DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHERS RELATED TO E-COMMERCE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS FOR USERS ON-LINE VIA TELEPHONE OR THE INTERNET; AND INTERFACE DESIGN FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |