Drawing for STYLECREST HOME SERVICES

USPTO serial 76102264

STYLECREST HOME SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STYLECREST HOME SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Dimitrijevs

JAMES A DIMITRIJEVS CALFEE HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2613UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring appliances, construction materials, and building maintenance supplies for homes and mobile homes; distributorships in the field of appliances, construction materials, and building maintenance supplies for homes and mobile homes; retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the fields of appliances, construction materials, and building maintenance supplies for homes and mobile homesACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of appliances; construction and repair of homes and mobile homesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Feb 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 28, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance