Drawing for SPIDERLIFT

USPTO serial 76102848

SPIDERLIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPIDERLIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas P. Liniak

THOMAS P LINIAK LINIAK BERENATO LONGACRE & WHITE LLC6550 ROCK SPRING DR STE 240BETHESDA, MD 20817-1173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal stands with pivoting wheel assemblies for power toolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 2, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance