USPTO serial 76102932
INPHOGENE BIOCOM INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INPHOGENE BIOCOM INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D SCOTT
MICHAEL D SCOTT PERKINS COIE LP1620 26TH ST 6TH FLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED IN ASSOCIATION WITH MINING AND MANIPULATION OF GENOMIC AND BIOINFORMATIC DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVISION OF AN ON-LINE DATABASE AND SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR DETERMINING OR ANALYZING OVER THE INTERNET WITH RESPECT TO GENOMIC INFORMATION; GENETIC RESEARCH; COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GENOMIC INFORMATION; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF GENETIC VARIABLE AND ASSESSMENT PROTOCOLS FOR USE IN SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE AREA OF BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DRUG DESIGN | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |