USPTO serial 76104559
LIFER BRAND CRIMINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFER BRAND CRIMINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Poole, Dorset BH12 4BQ, GB
Poole, Dorset BH12 4BQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MONICA S. VERMA
MONICA S VERMA BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3485Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded audio compact discs, audio tapes and audio cassettes featuring new-age music; computer game software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |