Drawing for AUNT SAMANTHA-AMERICA FIRST

USPTO serial 76106045

AUNT SAMANTHA-AMERICA FIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUNT SAMANTHA-AMERICA FIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael I. Kroll

MICHAEL I KROLL171 STILLWELL LNSYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely awards, charts and certificates containing a version of Uncle Sam with the expression "Aunt Samantha - America First"ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 11, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2006PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
May 25, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 2, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 17, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 12, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2003EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Aug 28, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 1, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 18, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 30, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance