USPTO serial 76107520
DURALAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DURALAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Lake In The Hills, IL
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Lake In The Hills, IL
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Lake In The Hills, IL
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M Ozog
BRIAN M OZOG CARPONELLI & KRUG230 W MONROE ST STE 250CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Laminated fluoropolymer composite fabrics manufactured for use in industrial, consumer and military applications, namely, release fabrics, conveyor belts, gaskets, filters, curtains, clothing, protective covers and release liners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Flexible Composites, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DURALAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |