USPTO serial 76111588
EMAIL A FRIEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMAIL A FRIEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOUSEMARK FOR A FULL LINE OF DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BOOKS, MAGAZINES, NEWSPAPERS AND SCREENPLAYS FEATURING FICTION AND NONFICTION LITERATURE, ART, HISTORY, EDUCATION, HEALTH, MATHEMATICS, ECONOMICS AND OTHER TOPICS OF GENERAL INTERESTS; DOWNLOADABLE MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; AND A HOUSEMARK FOR A FULL LINE OF DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING FICTION AND NONFICTION LITERATURE, ART, HISTORY, EDUCATION, HEALTH, MATHEMATICS, ECONOMICS AND OTHER TOPICS OF GENERAL INTERESTS | ACTIVE | Dec 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PRRG | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |