USPTO serial 76113926
CHEMO-IMRT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEMO-IMRT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fredericksburg, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ross F. Hunt Jr
ROSS F HUNT JR TRANSPOTOMACLARSON & TAYLOR1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1437Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR SEQUENCING MODULE, SYSTEM OR DATABASE PROVIDING GUIDELINES FOR RISK ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITIZATION IN CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION TREATMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |