Drawing for STREET VANDAL

USPTO serial 76114090

STREET VANDAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with STREET VANDAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN D. MURPHY

STEPHEN D MURPHY400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-3322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Vehicles and parts therefor; bicycles and parts therefor; automotive bumpers; automobile seat cushions; automobile windshield sunshades; automobiles and parts therefor; aerodynamic fairings for vehicles; frames for bicycles; go-carts; ground effect vehicles; hub caps; minibikes; motorcycles and parts therefor; mud guards; saddle covers for bicycles; saddles for bicycles; vehicle seat covers; vehicle seats; shock absorbers; suspension systems for vehicles; motorized scooters and parts thereforACTIVE—
016graphic art reproductions, printed art reproductions, pressure sensitive graphics for automobiles; paper banners, loose leaf binders, book covers, coloring books, calendars, playing cards, trading cards, cartoons, children's books, decals, car tattoos; iron-on transfers; paper emblems, printed emblems, picture postcards, pictures, art pictures, postcards, posters, flags, stickers, bumper stickers, wall calendarsACTIVE—
025clothing; footwear; head wearACTIVE—
028In-line skates, skateboards, roller skates and parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jan 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance