Drawing for CREATIVE DNA

USPTO serial 76115229

CREATIVE DNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CREATIVE DNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eliane Setton, Esq.

ELIANE SETTON ESQ GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICHP O BOX 77630SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-0630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software design for others, namely, design of computer software stored on digital media; industrial design; graphic art design; and design for others in the field of engineering; computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; computer software design for others for use in e-commerce business applications; computer services, namely, providing customized online web pages featuring user-defined information, which include the posting of designs created by one party which are available to other parties to allow the sharing of designs and to facilitate business to business commerce, search engines and online weblinks to news, weather, sports, current events and reference material, all in the wide range of user defined fieldsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance