USPTO serial 76116957
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KiSong Kim Lang-Caditz
KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and scientific devices employing a defined communications protocol for wireless digital communication with a global communications network, namely, telephones, location independent telephones, digital telephones, analog telephones, pagers, radios, two-way radios, WAP-enabled smart phones, computers; computer software used to facilitate wireless communication; personal digital assistants; WAP-enabled controller embedded in household appliances that facilitate control of or communication with said household appliances; atmospheric environment sensors used to sense atmospheric gases or particulates; security sensors; environment control systems, namely, temperature sensors, temperature gauges, electronic switches, scanners, motion sensors, magnetic encoded card readers, programmable atmospheric control devices, namely, thermostats, blower controllers, and fan controllers, WAP-enabled controller embedded in environment control systems that facilitate control of or communication with said environment control systems; security control systems, namely, magnetic encoded card readers, scanners, electronic switches, WAP-enabled controller embedded in parking gates, motion sensors, optical scanners, memory cards, WAP-enabled controller embedded in programmable access control barriers, namely, doors, gates, or screens, WAP-enabled controller embedded in security control systems that facilitate control of or communication with said security control systems; communication gateways; proxy communications servers; automated teller machines; wireless automated teller machines; cash registers; electronic wallets, namely, computer software for enabling consumers to make payments in on-line purchase transactions and to maintain on-line financial accounts; software used to conduct financial transactions via a global communications network; WAP-enabled telematics equipment embedded within packaging, automobiles or other mobile products that transmit location information by utilizing a satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system; a transmitter that identifies location relative to a fixed point such as a cellular system, radio system, or a telemetry device; parking control systems, namely, magnetic encoded card readers, counters used to count cars, WAP-enabled controller embedded in programmable access control barriers, namely, doors, gates, or screens, electronic video display monitors for use with parking control systems; electrical circuits; electronic video display monitors for use with automated teller machines; electronic video display monitors for use with commercial transaction equipment; electronic video display monitors for use in wireless communication | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing quality assurance services and quality assurance testing in the field of wireless communication | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |