Drawing for W@P CERTIFIED

USPTO serial 76116957

W@P CERTIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W@P CERTIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KiSong Kim Lang-Caditz

KISONG KIM LANG-CADITZ CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic and scientific devices employing a defined communications protocol for wireless digital communication with a global communications network, namely, telephones, location independent telephones, digital telephones, analog telephones, pagers, radios, two-way radios, WAP-enabled smart phones, computers; computer software used to facilitate wireless communication; personal digital assistants; WAP-enabled controller embedded in household appliances that facilitate control of or communication with said household appliances; atmospheric environment sensors used to sense atmospheric gases or particulates; security sensors; environment control systems, namely, temperature sensors, temperature gauges, electronic switches, scanners, motion sensors, magnetic encoded card readers, programmable atmospheric control devices, namely, thermostats, blower controllers, and fan controllers, WAP-enabled controller embedded in environment control systems that facilitate control of or communication with said environment control systems; security control systems, namely, magnetic encoded card readers, scanners, electronic switches, WAP-enabled controller embedded in parking gates, motion sensors, optical scanners, memory cards, WAP-enabled controller embedded in programmable access control barriers, namely, doors, gates, or screens, WAP-enabled controller embedded in security control systems that facilitate control of or communication with said security control systems; communication gateways; proxy communications servers; automated teller machines; wireless automated teller machines; cash registers; electronic wallets, namely, computer software for enabling consumers to make payments in on-line purchase transactions and to maintain on-line financial accounts; software used to conduct financial transactions via a global communications network; WAP-enabled telematics equipment embedded within packaging, automobiles or other mobile products that transmit location information by utilizing a satellite navigational system, namely, a global positioning system; a transmitter that identifies location relative to a fixed point such as a cellular system, radio system, or a telemetry device; parking control systems, namely, magnetic encoded card readers, counters used to count cars, WAP-enabled controller embedded in programmable access control barriers, namely, doors, gates, or screens, electronic video display monitors for use with parking control systems; electrical circuits; electronic video display monitors for use with automated teller machines; electronic video display monitors for use with commercial transaction equipment; electronic video display monitors for use in wireless communicationACTIVE—
042Providing quality assurance services and quality assurance testing in the field of wireless communicationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 29, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance