USPTO serial 76118761
PINGO POKER-BINGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINGO POKER-BINGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP J. ANDERSON
ROBERT RYAN MORISHITA ANDERSON & MORISHITA LLC3800 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY STE 850LAS VEGAS, NV 89109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming machines | ACTIVE | Apr 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |