USPTO serial 76130578
ADVANTAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976541Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ADVANTAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Miller
MARK E MILLER O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP275 BATTERY ST 26TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductor manufacturing automation and communication software used to track, identify, manage, control and route lots, carriers, SMIF-Pods, operators, reticles and probe cards in the manufacture of semiconductor wafers, flat panel displays, and magnetic media; semiconductor manufacturing automation and communication device comprising sensors used to track, identify, manage, control and route lots, carriers, SMIF-Pods, operators, reticles and probe cards, an input device, a display, and a microcomputer, all for use in the manufacture of semiconductor wafers, flat panel displays, and magnetic media | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |