USPTO serial 76132764
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-80538 Munchen, DE
D-80538 Munchen, DE
D-80538 Munchen, DE
GRASBRUNN, DE
Aschheim, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell BLUE FILAMENT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLCFIRST FLOOR450 NORTH OLD WOODWARDBIRMINGHAM, MI 48009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE RECORDED ON MAGNETIC AND OPTICAL DATA CONTAINING APPLICATION SOFTWARE FOR CREDIT CARD CLEARING SERVICES, AND PREPAID SERVICES PROCESSING, DATABASE ENGINE SOFTWARE, DATA ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE, DATA DECRYPTION SOFTWARE, AND SOFTWARE FOR PROCESSING DIGITAL SIGNATURES; AUTOMATIC VENDING MACHINES; CASH REGISTERS AND CALCULATORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | [ LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | MONEY-RELATED SERVICES, NAMELY, CREDIT CARD CLEARING SERVICES, DEBIT CARD PROCESSING SERVICES, AND PREPAID SERVICES PROCESSING, NAMELY, PREPAID PURCHASE CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, PROCESSING ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS MADE THROUGH PREPAID CARDS, THROUGH ESCROW ACCOUNTS AND/OR THROUGH STORED VALUE ACCOUNTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT, UPGRADING AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE LIBRARIES; CREATION, DEVELOPMENT, UPGRADING, AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER DATABASES IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL CONSUMER SCORING; RENTAL AND LEASING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER DATABASES TO THIRD PARTIES ON A CONTRACTUAL BASIS; TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING AND SET-UP OF SERVICES RELATED TO COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE CONTEXT OF CREDIT CARD CLEARING, DEBIT CARD PROCESSING AND PREPAID SERVICES PROCESSING; PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO USERS IN THE NATURE OF HELPDESKS, BY CALL CENTERS OR EMAIL; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, EVALUATION RELATING TO COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE CONTEXT OF CREDIT CARD CLEARING, DEBIT CARD PROCESSING AND PREPAID SERVICES PROCESSING AND APPLICATION PLANNING SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2014 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 3, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |