USPTO serial 76135122
US DATACOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with US DATACOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN MICHAEL HARLOW
JOHN MICHAEL HARLOW FIRST UNION CAPITOLPARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLPP O BOX 389RALEIGH, NC 27602-0389Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | SALES OF THE NETWORKING HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT OF OTHERS TO CLIENTS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NETWORKING HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
| 042 | NETWORK DESIGN; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; MONITORING THE COMPUTER SYSTEMS OF OTHERS AND PROVIDING BACK-UP COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES; COMPUTER NETWORK DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING; MONITORING THE NETWORKING SYSTEMS OF OTHERS, INCLUDING RELAYING DATA REGARDING OUTAGES, SECURITY AND UTILIZATION; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTATION REGARDING THE BUSINESS USE OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK TECHNOLOGY, NAMELY, INTERNET AND WORLD WIDE WEB BUSINESS STRATEGIES | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |