Drawing for TREND DESIGN BY BLUNCK

USPTO serial 76135598

TREND DESIGN BY BLUNCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TREND DESIGN BY BLUNCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Horst M. Kasper

HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059-5832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020CHAIRS, TABLES, SHELVES, FILING CABINETS, PREPARATORY CABINETS, SIDEBOARDS, PICTURE FRAMES, OFFICE FURNITURE, STOOLS, HAT STANDS, COUCHES, CARD FILES, CHEST OF DRAWERS, LECTERNS, LOUNGERS, CABINETS, UMBRELLA STANDS, CLOTHS RACKS, WRITING CABINETS, DESKS, SOFAS, MIRRORS, NEWSPAPER RACKS, LAMELLAR CABINETS, CABINET DOORS, CABINET MAKER PRODUCED FURNITURE, GLASS DISPLAY CABINETS; DOORS FOR FURNITURE; GLASS CABINETS; DECORATIONS MADE OF WOOD; DECORATIONS MADE OF WILLOW; DECORATIONS MADE OF HORN; DECORATIONS MADE OF BONES; DECORATIONS MADE OF IVORY; DECORATIONS MADE OF WHALEBONES; DECORATIONS MADE OF TORTOISESHELLS; DECORATIONS MADE OF AMBER; DECORATIONS MADE OF MOTHER-OF-PEARL; DECORATIONS MADE OF MEERSCHAUM AND OF SUBSTITUTE MATERIALS THEREOF; DECORATIONS MADE OF PLASTICACTIVE—
042WOOD WORKINGS, NAMELY, SAWING, ETCHING, MILLING, DRILLING, NAILING, SCREWING, POLISHING, DOWELING, GRINDING, STEEPING IN CORROSIVE FLUIDS, STAINING, MOULDING; DESIGNING FURNITURE FOR HOMES, OFFICES, HOTELS, BISTROS, RESTAURANTS, STUDIOS, NAMELY, DANCE STUDIOS, THEATER MOVIE STUDIOS, AND CLUB ROOMS, NAMELY, DANCE CLUB ROOMS, GOLF CLUB ROOMS, SPORTS CLUB ROOMS, BAR ROOMS, DANCE BAR ROOMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance