Drawing for ARTLINK

USPTO serial 76138915

ARTLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARTLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony J. Casella

ANTHONY J CASELLA CASELLA & HESPOS274 MADISON AVE RM 1703NEW YORK, NY 10016-0701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035On-line retail services featuring fine art; marketing for others of fine art by means of a global computer network; providing an on-line art gallery by means of a global computer network; and conducting live auctions and on-line auctions in the field of fine artABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 2, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 2, 2003OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 23, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance