USPTO serial 76140016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
Shinfield, Reading, GB
Other trademarks owned by International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
Shinfield, Reading, GB
Other trademarks owned by International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
Shinfield, Reading, GB
Other trademarks owned by International Food Information Service (IFIS Publishing)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD BRAVERMAN,
TODD BRAVERMAN, PEARL COHEN ZEDEK LATZER LLP1500 BROADWAY, 12TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Provision of multiple user dial-in access to a global computer information network; providing access to and leasing access time to computer databases featuring information in relation to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; providing on-line discussion forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning issues in relation to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2002 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing and distributing course materials in connection therewith; library services; organizing educational conferences, lectures, meetings and courses in the field of food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic work of others on CD-ROMs featuring information in relation to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; music publishing services; publication of printed materials, namely, technical abstracts in the field of food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; publication of books, journals and academic texts; provision of online information featuring education in relation to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing via a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring educational information on food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; training in the field of food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2002 |
| 042 | Desktop publishing for others; providing on-line publications, namely, reports, technical abstracts, brochures, leaflets, journals, articles, periodicals, newsletters, magazines, catalogs, printed pullout sections and printed inserts relating to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; computer services, namely, compilation, storage, analysis and retrieval of data relating to food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing; provision of on-line information in relation to food science, nutrition and food technology via a global computer network; providing on-line interactive computer databases in the field of food science, nutrition and food technology; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others and updating and designing computer software for others; language translation services; intellectual property consultation, namely, providing information regarding intellectual property rights; providing research and consultation services in the fields of food science, nutrition, food technology and food manufacturing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |