Drawing for LIGHTCROSS TECHNOLOGY FOR OPTICAL NETWORKING

USPTO serial 76143936

LIGHTCROSS TECHNOLOGY FOR OPTICAL NETWORKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTCROSS TECHNOLOGY FOR OPTICAL NETWORKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence J Siskind

LAWRENCE J SISKIND HARVEY SISKIND JACOBS LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR 39TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical networking components and subsystems, namely, wave division multiplexing and optical switches, filters, modulators, optical signal amplifiers, equalizers, demultiplexers, lasers, and integrated chips and devices, namely, transmitters, amplifiers, add/drops, cross connects, and receiversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 5, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance