Drawing for POLYPATENT

USPTO serial 76146098

POLYPATENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2685329Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 11, 2003
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYPATENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Blynn L. Shideler

Blynn L. Shideler The BLK Law Group3500 Brooktree RoadSuite 200Wexford, PA 15090

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042legal services; legal advice and representation and legal professional consulting services, namely, counseling, prosecution, protection, licensing, litigation and dispute resolution of patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, employee inventorship, unfair competition and general intellectual property matters; third party legal letter writing, services of a patent attorney, a trademark attorney, a copyright attorney, services of a European trademark attorney and a European patent attorney, legal research and prior art research; design of computer software for others; counseling in scientific and technical matters, namely, scientific and technical matters relating to biology, biochemistry, chemistry, engineering and physicsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 20, 1977

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Dec 13, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 1, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2012NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2012RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 10, 201289AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 4, 2012E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 10, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 7, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 11, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance