USPTO serial 76159273
CEREGENE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2854220Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 15, 2004
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CEREGENE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy L. Taylor
Stacy L. Taylor DLA PIPER LLP (US)SUITE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRIVESAN DIEGO, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Gene delivery system, comprised of viral vectors, packaging cells, and cells transduced with viral vectors in vitro to express transgenes for use in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, inflammatory diseases, and genetic diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 22, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CEREGENE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CEREGENE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CEREGENE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Cell Genesys, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named CEREGENE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |