USPTO serial 76162552
INFINITE CHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 16, 2003
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INFINITE CHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills, MI
Farmington Hills, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher S. Thomas
AMY E RINALDO KOHN & ASSOCIATES30500 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 410FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334-3179UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE CHANGE
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE CHANGE
- Other trademarks owned by INFINITE CHANGE
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INFINITE CHANGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |