USPTO serial 76164917
VIRTUAL VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2003
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUAL VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MACCLESFIELD, CHESHIRE, GB
MACCLESFIELD, CHESHIRE, GB
Carterbench Product Development, Ltd
Macclesfield Chesshire, GB
Other trademarks owned by Carterbench Product Development, Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John V Moriarty
111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for splicing together a plurality of images into a single image viewable through a lenticular screen; blank magnetic data carriers; discs, tapes, compact discs and mini discs all prerecorded with sound for children's entertainment; vending machines; electronic circuit boards, transducers, loudspeaker coils, solenoids and magnets which cause motion | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | games, toys and playthings, namely-- toys having a lenticular image which can be rotated or moved to give the effect of animation on said image, and namely, soft toys, toy robots, toy models, hand held learning toys having miniature battery or mains powered simulated televisions, hand held electronic games and child or baby activity centres; toys capable of sound emission in synchronization with the movement of a lenticular image, and namely soft toys, toy robots, toy models, hand held learning toys and novelty devices having miniature battery or mains powered simulated televisions, hand held electronic games and toys with screens namely child or baby activity centres; board games; and racing games having tracks built up from a number of similar or identical track components | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRTUAL VIDEO (UK) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by VIRTUAL VIDEO (UK) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Carterbench Product Development, Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL VIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |