USPTO serial 76169593
LINEA UOMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINEA UOMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark N. Mutterperl
MARK N MUTTERPERL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's clothing, namely, anklet socks, parkas, belts, blazers, boxer shorts, cardigans, coats, jackets, jeans, mufflers, polo shirts, rain coats, rain wear, shoes, shorts, socks, suit coats, suspenders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |