USPTO serial 76173332
SUPERSMOLT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERSMOLT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Antoinette G Giugliano
JOHN L DUPRE HAMILTON BROOK SMITH & REYNOLDS PC530 VIRGINIA RDP O BOX 9133CONCORD, MA 01742-9133Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Anadromous fish, namely, arctic char, trout, and salmon that have one or more characteristics of a pre-smolt fish | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |