![Drawing for [MIND OVER EMATTER]](/media/trademark/76173708)
USPTO serial 76173708
[MIND OVER EMATTER]
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with [MIND OVER EMATTER]?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY NELKIN
AMY NELKIN DARBY & DARBY LAW OFFICE805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DESIGNING WEB SITES AND ENABLING OTHERS TO PROMOTE THEMSELVES AND DEVELOP PRODUCTS OVER THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 042 | WEB BASED COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS AND WEB BASED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR SELF-MARKETING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER AND INTERNET SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, AND MAINTAINING INTERNET WEB SITES AND INFRASTRUCTURS FOR OTHERS, PROVIDING COMPUTER AND E-COMMERCE CONSULTATION AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |