Drawing for WET DOG

USPTO serial 76177173

WET DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WET DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHMNAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, mascara, lipstick and lip gloss, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing lotions, skin creams, skin emulsions, hair lotions; fragrances, namely perfumes, toilet water, colognes; sun tanning preparations; and skin care products, namely, moisturizer, body powder, face powder, bath powder, shampoo and deodorant and antiperspirants for personal useACTIVE—
016Books featuring photography, books in the field of fashion, books in the field of travel, vacation and leisure, books in the field of outdoor entertaining, book covers, game book manuals in the field of role playing game equipment, book plates, book rests, bookends, bookmarks, appointment books, autograph books, children's books, coloring books, composition books notebooks, picture books, song books, guest books and travel booksACTIVE—
018fanny packs and knapsacksACTIVE—
024towelsACTIVE—
025swimwear related sportswear, namely, bathing suits, bathing trunks, T-shirts, shorts, hats, caps, bathing caps, sandals, beach shoes, sweatshirts and sweatpantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 5, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 5, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 23, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 23, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 31, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 31, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 31, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 2, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 5, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 28, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance