USPTO serial 76179806
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BATON ROUGE, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
Baton Rouge, LA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Thurmon
Mark A. Thurmon ROY, KIESEL, KEEGAN & DENICOLAPO BOX 15928BATON ROUGE, LA 70895-5928UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software services, namely software and application development, and integration of different computer systems and networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 8, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |