USPTO serial 76180927
MITAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MITAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
106 24 Praha 10, CZ
106 24 Praha 10, CZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA D HERBST
ASHLEY A PHILLIPS MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWATTN TMSUWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | TIRE MOUNTING SERVICES CONSISTING OF PROVIDING TIRES TO ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS ON A TIRE RIM FOR THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF TIRES-- INDUSTRIAL TIRES, AGRICULTURAL AND GARDEN TIRES, FORKLIFT TIRES, TIRES FOR EARTHMOVING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY LOADERS, GRADERS, BULLDOZERS, EXCAVATORS, DUMPERS AND MINING EQUIPMENT, INDUSTRIAL TRACTOR TIRES, WHEELBARROW TIRES, TIRES FOR TRUCKS, NOT INCLUDING VANS, TRUCKS AND PICKUPS WITH A LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY NOT IN EXCESS OF 2.5 TONS; MOTORCYCLE AND BICYCLE TIRES, AND AIRCRAFT TIRES, BUT SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDING THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF TIRES-- TIRES FOR PASSENGER VEHICLES, NAMELY, PASSENGER CARS, WAGONS, MINIVANS, PASSENGER VANS, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |