Drawing for MIAMI MARLINS

USPTO serial 76182083

MIAMI MARLINS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIAMI MARLINS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin

MARY L KEVLIN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, VISORS, KNITTED HEADWEAR, HEADBANDS, BANDANNAS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATERS, TURTLENECKS, PULLOVERS, VESTS, SHORTS, PANTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, OVERALLS, BODYSUITS, BASEBALL UNIFORMS, JERSEYS, WARM-UP SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, UNDERWEAR, BOXER SHORTS, ROBES, SLEEPWEAR, SWIMWEAR, CLOTHING WRAPS, COATS, JACKETS, PONCHOS, RAINCOATS, CLOTH BIBS, INFANTWEAR, INFANT DIAPER COVERS, CLOTH DIAPER SETS WITH UNDERSHIRT AND DIAPER COVER, JUMPERS, ROMPERS, INFANTS UNDERWEAR, COVERALLS, CREEPERS, BABY BOOTIES, TIES, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, MONEY BELTS, MITTENS, GLOVES, WRISTBANDS, EARMUFFS, SCARVES, FOOTWEAR, SOCKS, HOSIERY, SLIPPERS, APRONS, SLIDING GIRDLES AND HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance