Drawing for EBR

USPTO serial 76182938

EBR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EBR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary D Krugman

GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004BUTANES, AROMATIC PETROLEUM EXTRACT OIL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; NATURAL GAS; GASOLINE; REFINERY RESIDUAL GASES NAMELY, METHANE, ETHANE, ETHYLENE, PROPANES AND COMBINATIONS THEREOF; FUEL OIL, DIESEL OIL; JET FUELS, HEATING OIL; EMULSION FUEL FOR INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY; SYNTHETIC LUBRICANT STOCK FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ALL PURPOSE LUBRICANTS; INDUSTRIAL OILS, NAMELY, COAL-OIL MIXTURES, BASESTOCK, DIESEL CYLINDER OIL, SPINDLE OIL, GAS TURBINE OIL, ELECTRICAL OIL AND SHALE OILACTIVE—
039TRANSPORTATION OF PRODUCTS BY EITHER TRUCK OR SHIP; STORAGE OF OIL AND GAS; TRANSMISSION OF OIL OR GAS THROUGH PIPELINESACTIVE—
040MATERIAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, TREATMENT OF CRUDE MINERAL OIL IN REFINERIES; MANUFACTURE OF GENERAL PRODUCT LINES IN THE FIELD OF MINERAL OILS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS; AND FUEL AND OIL REFINING, NAMELY, THE TREATMENT OF PETROLEUM CONTAINING ROCKS, NAMELY, SHALEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance