USPTO serial 76187639
MICROCONTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROCONTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J Bourque
DANIEL J BOURQUE BOURQUE AND ASSOCIATES835 HANOVER STSTE 303MANCHESTER, NH 03104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE FOR CLEANING, DEGREASING, PAINT REMOVAL AND SURFACE CLEANING AND PREPARATION, THAT CLEANS BY PROPELLING PLIANT MEDIA AGAINST A SURFACE; AND PARTS THEREFORE | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 1998 |
| 021 | PLIANT SURFACE PREPARATION MEDIA, NAMELY, SPONGE PARTICLES FOR SURFACE PREPARATION, NAMELY, CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING, DEGREASING, STAIN REMOVING, PAINT REMOVING, VARNISH REMOVING AND RUST REMOVING FOR USE WITH INDUSTRIAL CLEANING MACHINES THAT CLEAN BY PROPELLING THE PLIANT MEDIA AGAINST A SURFACE FOR CLEANING, POLISHING, SCOURING, DEGREASING, STAIN REMOVING, PAINT REMOVING, VARNISH REMOVING AND RUST REMOVING | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |