USPTO serial 76188077
SERVICE IN MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERVICE IN MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; RENTAL OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT IN GENERAL | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS, NAMELY, CONSULTATION REGARDING THE USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE IN ELECTRONIC BUSINESS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF INTERNET APPLICATIONS; INTERNET AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING; RENTAL OF COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OHG
- Other trademarks owned by Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OHG
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SERVICE IN MOTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |