USPTO serial 76191670
ISABELLA ROSSELLINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISABELLA ROSSELLINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N Fredbeck
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | coats, sport coats, capes, tuxedos, suits, blazers, jackets, parkas, rainwear, trousers, pants, slacks, jeans, shirts, polo shirts, sport shirts, t-shirts, pullovers, sweaters, coveralls dresses, gowns, skirts, blouses, bathrobes, loungewear, dressing gowns, sleepwear, lingerie, camisoles, foundation garments, underclothes, undergarments, underwear, bustiers, shorts, bermuda shorts, beachwear, swimwear, body suits, leotards, unitards, footwear, shoes, boots, hosiery, leg warmers, leggings, socks, tights, headwear, turbans, neckties, gloves, belts, scarves, shawls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |