USPTO serial 76192436
PROLOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROLOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-231 25 Trelleborg, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony P. Venturino
ANTHONY P VENTURINO STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER. & MOSHER, LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | HARD SURFACE COVERINGS FOR FLOORS COMPRISED OF WOOD, THERMOSETTING LAMINATE, THERMOSETTING LAMINATE BONDED TO A BASE OF PARTICLE BOARD OR FIBER BOARD; FIBER BOARD OR PARTICLE BOARD, PROVIDED WITH A DECORATIVE SURFACE OR COATING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |