USPTO serial 76192864
FLORAL DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLORAL DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARGO LYNN HABLUTZEL
MARGO LYNN HABLUTZEL MARY KAY INC16251 DALLAS PKWYP O BOX 799045DALLAS, TX 75379-9045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume; cologne; fragrance products, namely shower gel, bath gel, body soap, essential oils for personal use, bath oil, and body oil; non-medicated bath salts; bubble bath; lotions, namely facial and body lotions, body cream, body powder, body gels, body sprays and mists; skin care products, namely, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, fresheners, skin toners, skin moisturizer, night cream, skin cleansing bars, facial soaps, hand creams, body creams, face creams, skin conditioners, oil controllers, oil absorbers, beauty masks, muds, skin buffing creams, facial scrubs, and body scrub, skin exfoliators; skin emollients; body polishers; non-medicated sunscreen lotions; non-medicated sun block lotions; cosmetics, namely, self tanning lotions, liquid foundation makeup, cream foundation makeup, facial highlighters, blemish concealers, mascara, eyeliners, eye pencils, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eye makeup remover, blushers, rouge, powder and cream cheek colors, loose and pressed face powder, lips ticks, lip gloss, lip liner pencils, lip color crayons; lipstick adjusters, namely preparations used to adjust the shade of lip color; nail care preparations; nail colors, nail top and base coats | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed business supplies and sales aids for those engaged in the promotion and sale of cosmetics, skin care and like products, namely, business cards, reminder postcards, note paper, order forms and planning sheets, decals, stationery plastic or paper bags for merchandise packaging, bank checks | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Tote bags, cosmetic bags sold empty; travel bags; lipstick holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cosmetic vanity trays; compacts sold empty; cosmetic brushes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mary Kay Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named FLORAL DESIGN
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |